The Shadow Catcher v. An Arsonist’s Guide to Writers’ Homes in New England
presented by
ROUND ONE
The Shadow Catcher
v. An Arsonist’s Guide to Writers’ Homes in New England
Judged by Helen DeWitt
Helen DeWitt is a novelist. Op. 101, The Last Samurai, was published as a “first novel” in 2000. An excerpt from Your Name Here, a collaboration with Ilya Gridneff, appeared recently in n+1. She is now working on two books begun during a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2006-7. She lives in Berlin. Connections to this year’s competitors: “I don’t have any connections with the authors of any of the books under consideration.”
Fredric Jameson says of Adorno’s use of Freud:
Neurosis is simply this boring imprisonment of the self in itself, crippled by its terror of the new and unexpected, carrying its sameness with it wherever it goes, so that it has the protection of feeling, whatever it might stretch out its hand to touch, that it never meets anything but what it knows already.
He might have been writing of The Shadow Catcher and An Arsonist’s Guide to Writers’ Homes in New England.
An Arsonist’s Guide occupies a region, implausibly you may think, somewhere between Anne Tyler and Chuck Palahniuk. The Shadow Catcher occupies a region, again you may think implausibly, somewhere between W.G. Sebald and Joan Didion. Both start with promising ideas.
In An Arsonist’s Guide, a man finishes a 10-year prison sentence for accidentally setting fire to the Emily Dickinson House, thereby killing two people; marries, has children, conceals the bad past which comes back to haunt him, finds that someone is setting fire to writers’ homes in a way that makes him look like the arsonist. There are domestic eccentricities, there is Grand Guignol.
In The Shadow Catcher, the fictional alter-ego of Marianne Wiggins writes a book about Edward Curtis, photographer of vanishing tribes of the American West, who gets a call from a hospital: A dying man has taken on the identity of her father, who committed suicide decades ago. Solving the mystery alternates with chapters recounting the story of Clara, Curtis’s neglected wife. There are reproductions of photographs and documents, there are savvy comments on American culture and topography.
Both books are marred by a peculiarly American obsession with neurosis, wearying the reader with the sort of insight best shared with one’s therapist. An Arsonist’s Guide, however, falls furthest short of its own aims: It’s unintentionally unfunny. So The Shadow Catcher goes on to the next round.
Advancing:
The Shadow Catcher
Match Commentary
with Kevin Guilfoile and John Warner
JOHN: Here’s one thing I learned reading today’s verdict: Helen DeWitt is one smart cookie, smarter than me, which makes me hesitant to admit that I quite enjoyed An Arsonist’s Guide, but since one of our recurring themes over the course of the first round is the subjectivity of taste and expectations when it comes to reading books, I’m just going to come out and say it: I liked An Arsonist’s Guide to Writer’s Homes in New England.
Also, I TiVo My Super Sweet 16.
And, I enjoy the smell of my dog’s paws.
KEVIN: Helen DeWitt is really, really smart. Having admitted that, I need to send B.R. Myers a letter of apology because most of what she said went over my head. Frederic Jameson who? Adorno what? Is he one of those American Gladiators you’ve been going on about? Sigmund Freud I know, but the thing about what Jameson said about what Adorno said about Freud, I’m not sure what that means. Anne Tyler meets Chuck Palahniuk? Phew, now we’re back in my comfort zone. For instance, I can imagine that if Chuck Palahniuk ever read parts of The Accidental Tourist aloud, or conversely if Anne Tyler ever read parts of Rant, people in the audience really would throw up and pass out.
Helen is the author of a novel called The Last Samurai (not the basis for the Tom Cruise film) that more than one person whose opinion I greatly respect counts among their favorite books of all time. It’s been perched sincerely on my to-be-read pile for about three years. Now I’m terrified it will be filled with references to Marxists I haven’t heard of referencing other Marxists I haven’t heard of. I’m over my head here, commentator-wise.
When this happens my mind usually just goes into total stroke-like retreat. Like right now I’d like to say something smart about one of these books but I’m actually thinking how curious it is that Lionel Richie, the composer of “Brick House,” raised a child built like Nicole: “Twanty-two, twanty-two, twanty-two, what a winning haaaaa-aannd…”
Forgive me, Helen. Blaaaargh.
JOHN: The only Jameson I’m aware of is the Irish whiskey, with which I used to be intimate until an incident circa 1994 when I was out with friends at the Rainbo Club in Chicago’s Wicker Park community (I know you know the place) and I got hammered on the stuff trying to work up the courage to talk to Liz Phair, who was drinking at the bar, and who I thought was “the poo,” as the kids might say. Let’s just say that leading with your stomach contents on to her shoes is not the way to pick up the indie-rock girl of the decade.
One of the things the Tournament of Books reveals each year is that you and I are a couple of mouth-breathing idiots without the intellect or education to really grapple with serious issues of book criticism.
This feeling of inadequacy is not a new phenomenon for me, considering I teach at an accredited university (their background check was lax) and Adorno, Freud, and Jameson are to my colleagues as Page, Plant, Bonham, and Jones are to me. In fact, just the other day, I overheard a joke about Horkheimer, Marcuse, Habermas, and the farmer’s daughter. I couldn’t really follow all of it, but the punchline was, “Frankfurt? I thought you said cock!”
Ohhhhhhhh!
Thanks folks, tip your servers, and we’ll be back tomorrow.
KEVIN: There are three experiences shared by all Chicago men who were 20-something and single in the first half of the ‘90s: