Against the Day v. Pride of Baghdad
presented by
ROUND ONE
Against the Day
v. Pride of Baghdad
Judged by Anthony Doerr
Anthony Doerr is the author of a story collection, The Shell Collector, and a novel, About Grace. His third book, a work of nonfiction entitled Four Seasons in Rome: On Twins, Insomnia, and the Biggest Funeral in the History of the World, inspired by his Letters From Rome on The Morning News, will be published in June. He was recently named one of Granta’s 20 Best Young American Novelists, a definitive list that, like the Tournament of Books, should never be questioned. In the interest of complete transparency, he admits to reading a few of Monica Ali’s stories in Alentejo Blue when they were in draft form and offering inadequate and unnecessary suggestions. And he has traded a half-dozen emails with Peter Orner.
So. Here we have an 1,100-page über-novel by an American master matched against a 136-page graphic novel by a writer best known for a series of comics about a superhuman mayor who can talk to machines.
Thomas Pynchon’s Against the Day took me 22 days and two international flights to finish. I read Brian Vaughan’s The Pride of Baghdad during lunch. Twice.
On page 108 of The Pride of Baghdad, for example, there is only one word: “Grahhhhh!”
Pages 112 and 113 feature two words: “Nah!” and “Unh!”
There are lots of words on all of the pages of Against the Day.
The Pride of Baghdad offers a wildly fictionalized version of the escape of four lions from the Baghdad Zoo during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Vaughan’s lions speak English, dodge tanks, battle a bear (Grahhhhh!), and—spoiler coming—ultimately get shredded by faceless Americans with M16s. Along the way, the novel asks some interesting questions about power, hunger, and the lives of animals. Niko Henrichon’s art is lavish and several of his two-page panoramas are breathtaking.
Against the Day, on the other hand, is almost completely irreducible. It is a multigenerational saga involving at least 20 protagonists who move through a (mostly) pre-World War I era in which alternate histories nestle within real histories, time is elastic, and New York City is burned to the ground by a possibly conscious and obviously angry meteorite. Among many, many, many other weird things.
(Such as: A skyship that enters the interior of the earth through a portal in Antarctica and floats over “a battlefield swarming with diminutive combatants wearing pointed hats and carrying what proved to be electric crossbows.” [p. 117])
(Such as: Two killers who take a willing bride to the “Four Corners and put her so one of her knees was in Utah, one in Colorado, one elbow in Arizona and the other in New Mexico—with the point of insertion exactly above the mythical crosshairs itself.” [p. 269])
(Such as: A crew of mischievous time-traveling “Trespassers” who appear now and then as “seekers of refuge from our present—your future—a time of worldwide famine, exhausted fuel supplies, terminal poverty—the end of the capitalistic experiment.” [p. 415])
Look, pretend for a moment you’re an ant. To read The Pride of Baghdad is to take a trip across a leaf. It’s fairly absorbing. There’s lots to see. Your view of the world might be minimally altered once you get across it.
To read Against the Day is to spend a boatload of ant-lifetimes exploring a tree with a trunk as big as a beer truck. There are forks and boughs and limbs and twigs and parasitic vines and tens of thousands of shimmering leaves. The tree moves and even seems to grow; you experience it only a centimeter at a time, but as you climb you begin to sense its vast, beyond-baroque architecture, its athletic density, its almost miraculous existence as a self-contained entity, simultaneously highbrow and lowbrow, ironic and heartfelt, campy and genuine.
Against the Day is a messy novel, fat as a phone book, foaming over with pop-fiction prose and go-nowhere chatter. It is not built to please, and readers who like their stories tidily put to rights will quickly find their brains pulped. But I am very grateful I had the opportunity to read it.
Advancing:
Against the Day
Match Commentary
with Kevin Guilfoile and John Warner
WARNER: This oddball match-up is a true testament to the absurdity and wonder that is the Tournament of Books. At a shipping weight of 3.31 pounds versus 1.15 for Pride of Baghdad, Against the Day literally triples the graphic novel in size. This is like asking Elizabeth Hasselbeck to face off against Michael Moore in celebrity sumo wrestling.
Mega-props to Judge Anthony Doerr for sorting this one out. It seems like a tougher job than the guy who’s charged with licking all of the color off the plain M&Ms backstage at an Avril Lavigne concert.
GUILFOILE: Speaking of musicians licking each other, haven’t all the white female contestants on American Idol this year looked exactly alike to you? That is, don’t they all look exactly like they’re leaving El Jardin at about 2:00 a.m. with my friend Scott even though I bought, like, three pitchers of margaritas, knew every single move from the Shiny Happy People video, and cracked everyone up with my impression of Bull from Night Court?
WARNER: I’d like to know why conservative commentators aren’t blasting away at the obvious reverse affirmative action practiced by American Idol, ensuring that six male singers make the final 12 despite there being, at max, two males who could even remotely hang with the women in a straight up sing-off. Where’s Bill Bennett when you need him?
GUILFOILE: Bill Bennett has already lost five large on Sundance Head and he has another 15 down on Cormac McCarthy. Also, I think he would say that this year’s American Idol is all about Title IX chickens coming home to roost.
What were we talking about again? Against the Day? Yeah, haven’t read that.
But I am glad that we included a graphic novel in the tourney this year, even if it got crushed like a stripped Pinto in the fiery jaws of the Pynchon Bookasaurus.